Man Not Guilty of Exposure Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court 2024
Our Client was charged with exposure, contrary to section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. It was alleged that our Client had exited a hotel where he was staying and had exposed his penis to two strangers who were sitting at a bus stop opposite, intending to thereby cause those strangers alarm or distress.
Our client's instructions were that he did not remember the incident, as he suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, and it had occurred during a period in 2023 when he had not been taking his medication. He was seriously unwell at the time, and, upon his arrest, was immediately sectioned under the Mental Health Act 1983. Our client had no previous convictions for sexual offences, and stated that, whilst he may indeed have exposed his penis, it was at a time where he was hallucinating and simply did not know what he was doing.
Paralegal Maeve Carroll meticulously assessed the Crown’s case and requested disclosure of relevant material which was subjected to fierce scrutiny. It became clear that the Crown were in possession of Body Worn Video footage of our client’s arrest, which we obtained; this footage revealed that our client seemed to have been hallucinating at the time and was under the delusion that the two strangers had asked him to expose his penis. The offence of exposure under section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 requires a person to not only expose themselves, but to do so with the intention to cause alarm or distress. The defence therefore argued that our client’s state of the mind was such that he did not have any such intention.
On this basis, Maeve Carroll instructed a psychiatrist to assess our client and prepare an expert report for trial. The expert was also asked to review the Body Worn Video footage to observe our client’s mental condition at the time of the offence. The psychiatric report concluded that, as a result of not taking his medication, our client may well have exposed his penis without the necessary intention to cause alarm or distress.
Senior solicitor Sanjay Cholera was instructed to represent the client at trial. Prior to the hearing, the Crown were asked to review the case in light of the defence’s psychiatric report. However, the Crown stated that they nonetheless wished to proceed to trial. The Crown put forward their case, including calling the Complainants to give evidence. At the close of the Crown’s case, Sanjay Cholera drew the Court’s attention to the psychiatric report, and submitted that the Crown had failed to prove that our client had intended to cause alarm or distress. The District Judge at Highbury Corner Magistrates Court agreed with the defence in reliance upon the psychiatric report, and consequently found our client not guilty of the offence. Our client was thus acquitted in full.
Contact our experts for further advice
James O'Donnell
, 
Umar Zeb
Umar Zeb
Danny ParkashHow can we help?
Common questions
We always work with the most experienced and best leading UK barristers, KCs (Kings Counsel). We cover all criminal cases 24/7 at the police station and court. Offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester cover cases across England and Wales. We can offer Legal Aid and affordable Private fee agreements. We can see you the same day, including virtually. Our Senior Partners supervise all of our cases.
How quickly do you respond?
We respond quickly even during out of hours. We do not get our work by paying for online adverts but based on the fact that few criminal law firms can match our 45 years of experience. Most of our cases are still from word-of-mouth recommendations from satisfied clients. We are called daily by dissatisfied clients from firms with less experience than us. We respond very quickly to new enquiries. We know what clients seek and so we update clients rapidly.
Can you get cases dropped?
Yes, read about the recent cases we've helped our clients with here.
We always keep you updated and give straightforward advice. We will get cases dropped early where the case is weak or should not be prosecuted. We will be upfront with you about where you can benefit from a good result with an early guilty plea, such as a discount on your sentence. As we work on cases across all levels with clients from all walks of life, we are excellent at giving clear, spot-on advice. As an established firm, we can allocate a whole team to your case often at short notice to secure evidence to minimise the damage to you.
Have you won any awards?
OUR PROFESSIONAL BODY THE LAW SOCIETY AWARDED US IN OCTOBER 2020 WITH THE EXCELLENCE IN CLIENT SERVICE AWARD AND STATED -
"JD Spicer Zeb demonstrated a clear commitment to client service through their work with vulnerable and diverse individuals in what can be severely traumatic circumstances".
Do you offer free consultations?
Where it is possible, we aim to provide an initial consultation to you. If we can speak to you, we can if required inform you about –
- Whether we can take the case on and our relevant experience.
- Public and private funding benefits.
- Assistance in applying for legal aid where we are likely to accept instructions.
- An outline of options in police interview only. We will not advise you on which option to adopt.
- Providing our free written guide explaining the police station process.
- The gravity of routine and day-to-day offences you face.
- Consequences of not attending the court or police station.
- Consequences of interfering with any witnesses.
- Retaining any evidence in support of your case.
- If possible an outline of the elements of the offence that the police or CPS must prove.
- This consultation will normally be by telephone or email and will only be for as long as we deem necessary to establish if we can act for you. If we cannot usefully give you any advice in this manner then we will not continue with the consultation. We will not discuss the case in depth for you to be able to decide on your plea or any significant aspect of the case, as this cannot be undertaken informally.
- Referring you, if possible, to other firms for matters out of our specialism or if we cannot help.
Consultations do not apply to the following cases –
- If we do not intend to take the case on.
- Road Traffic cases, drink driving, drug driving, driving bans, speeding, no insurance, mobile phone use, points etc.
- In all cases where we do not have the capacity to take your case or the availability of suitably qualified staff to provide an initial free consultation. This is applicable in all cases but especially where a more senior lawyer is required because of your personal needs or the complexity of the case.
- Harassment/stalking/ coercive behaviour/malicious communications or road traffic cases and most sensitive cases. These cases are often too complicated to assess in short consultations.
- The locations concerned may be too distant to represent you adequately or it may not be cost-effective for you or us.
- The case is too complicated to assess or raises various charges or facts, complexity, or history to be considered informally or in a short consultation.
- In most Legal aid transfers where legal aid is granted to another firm except in very grave cases, we may assess the case and merits for a transfer.
- If your relationship has broken down with your existing solicitor or several solicitors.
- If you have been released under investigation and have already had a police station attendance.
- If you hold legal aid with another firm and seek a second opinion.
- If you are calling on behalf of the client as a friend or family member unless you have full authority and full facts.
- To businesses.
- Advising whether you were given good advice by your other solicitor.
- Whether to decide to plead guilty or not guilty.
- Whether you have an arguable defence in law or factually complicated defences.
- Any advice you have had after your first court appearance.
- Any advice on appeal on conviction or sentence.
- If we feel we are unable to communicate with you.
- If we are likely to be conflicted or breach our professional rules.