Exceptional Hardship Argument Successful Lavender Hill Magistrates Court
Our Client Avoids Driving Disqualification: A Successful Outcome at Lavender Hill Magistrate’s Court
Our client recently faced sentencing at Lavender Hill Magistrate’s Court after being charged with Driving Without Business Insurance. The court indicated that it might impose a driving disqualification. Sanjay Cholera, a partner at our firm, attended the hearing and represented our client during the proceedings.
We were required to advance an exceptional hardship argument. Under UK law, when a driver is at risk of being disqualified, the Court can consider arguments related to the hardship that such a disqualification would impose. The Court examines the overall impact on the individual’s life because of losing their driving privileges. The hardship must not be the usual difficulties one would face but the exceptional hardship. In our case, we presented a compelling argument outlining the exceptional hardship our client would face if disqualified from driving. We made it clear that disqualification would not only disrupt his professional life but would also have significant personal implications.
The key reasons that underpinned our exceptional hardship argument were the following:
Impact on Client's Business Operations: Our client is a self-employed builder, and having access to a vehicle is crucial for the operation of his business. Without a vehicle, he would not be able to travel to job sites, transport tools, or meet clients, effectively making it impossible for him to continue his work as a builder.
Geographical Scope of Work: Our client’s building contracts span across all areas of London. Due to the nature of his work, it is not feasible for him to rely on public transport, especially since he is required to transport a variety of heavy and bulky tools. Public transport would not only be inconvenient but would also pose significant logistical challenges.
Dependence on Employees: Our client employs four subcontractors, all of whom are unable to drive. Therefore, if he were to lose his driving privileges, he would face serious difficulties in managing his team and ensuring the completion of contracts on time.
Family Dependency: In addition to his work-related responsibilities, our client is the sole driver in his household, as his wife does not drive. Therefore, disqualification would create a further strain on the family’s ability to manage daily activities, including childcare and other essential tasks that require transportation.
Sole Breadwinner: Our client is the sole breadwinner in his family, supporting not only his immediate household, but also other dependents. A disqualification from driving would severely hinder his ability to earn a living, causing financial hardship for his entire family.
Childcare Commitments: Our client is also responsible for taking his child to school four times a month. The school is located a significant distance from their home, and driving is the only practical means of transport. Furthermore, the school provides specialised education in Ukrainian literacy, an essential skill for our client’s child, meaning the drive is necessary for maintaining this educational opportunity.
To support these arguments, we called one of our client’s customers as a witness. The customer confirmed that our client regularly carried out building work on his properties across London.
After considering these points, the Magistrates agreed that our client would indeed suffer from exceptional hardship if he were disqualified from driving. The court acknowledged the significant personal and financial impacts such a decision would have on both our client and his family. As a result, the Magistrates decided not to disqualify our client from driving. Instead, he was issued with six penalty points on his driving license and a fine.
This outcome came as a relief for our client, as it allowed him to continue growing his business and his family.
If you have been arrested and charged with a road traffic offence or wish to advance exceptional hardship to avoid a driving ban. JD Spicer Zeb can act on a fixed fee basis usually in London in most cases from £1,500 plus VAT call 0207 624 7771 or email Solicitors@jdspicer.co.uk for a fast response. We strongly encourage you to reach out to us for legal support. Our experienced team is here to guide you through the legal process and work on achieving the best possible outcome for your case. You can contact us by phone or email for a confidential consultation.
How can we help?
Common questions
We always work with the most experienced and best leading UK barristers, KCs (Kings Counsel). We cover all criminal cases 24/7 at the police station and court. Offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester cover cases across England and Wales. We can offer Legal Aid and affordable Private fee agreements. We can see you the same day, including virtually. Our Senior Partners supervise all of our cases.
How quickly do you respond?
We respond quickly even during out of hours. We do not get our work by paying for online adverts but based on the fact that few criminal law firms can match our 45 years of experience. Most of our cases are still from word-of-mouth recommendations from satisfied clients. We are called daily by dissatisfied clients from firms with less experience than us. We respond very quickly to new enquiries. We know what clients seek and so we update clients rapidly.
Can you get cases dropped?
Yes, read about the recent cases we've helped our clients with here.
We always keep you updated and give straightforward advice. We will get cases dropped early where the case is weak or should not be prosecuted. We will be upfront with you about where you can benefit from a good result with an early guilty plea, such as a discount on your sentence. As we work on cases across all levels with clients from all walks of life, we are excellent at giving clear, spot-on advice. As an established firm, we can allocate a whole team to your case often at short notice to secure evidence to minimise the damage to you.
Have you won any awards?
OUR PROFESSIONAL BODY THE LAW SOCIETY AWARDED US IN OCTOBER 2020 WITH THE EXCELLENCE IN CLIENT SERVICE AWARD AND STATED -
"JD Spicer Zeb demonstrated a clear commitment to client service through their work with vulnerable and diverse individuals in what can be severely traumatic circumstances".
Do you offer free consultations?
Where it is possible, we aim to provide an initial consultation to you. If we can speak to you, we can if required inform you about –
- Whether we can take the case on and our relevant experience.
- Public and private funding benefits.
- Assistance in applying for legal aid where we are likely to accept instructions.
- An outline of options in police interview only. We will not advise you on which option to adopt.
- Providing our free written guide explaining the police station process.
- The gravity of routine and day-to-day offences you face.
- Consequences of not attending the court or police station.
- Consequences of interfering with any witnesses.
- Retaining any evidence in support of your case.
- If possible an outline of the elements of the offence that the police or CPS must prove.
- This consultation will normally be by telephone or email and will only be for as long as we deem necessary to establish if we can act for you. If we cannot usefully give you any advice in this manner then we will not continue with the consultation. We will not discuss the case in depth for you to be able to decide on your plea or any significant aspect of the case, as this cannot be undertaken informally.
- Referring you, if possible, to other firms for matters out of our specialism or if we cannot help.
Consultations do not apply to the following cases –
- If we do not intend to take the case on.
- Road Traffic cases, drink driving, drug driving, driving bans, speeding, no insurance, mobile phone use, points etc.
- In all cases where we do not have the capacity to take your case or the availability of suitably qualified staff to provide an initial free consultation. This is applicable in all cases but especially where a more senior lawyer is required because of your personal needs or the complexity of the case.
- Harassment/stalking/ coercive behaviour/malicious communications or road traffic cases and most sensitive cases. These cases are often too complicated to assess in short consultations.
- The locations concerned may be too distant to represent you adequately or it may not be cost-effective for you or us.
- The case is too complicated to assess or raises various charges or facts, complexity, or history to be considered informally or in a short consultation.
- In most Legal aid transfers where legal aid is granted to another firm except in very grave cases, we may assess the case and merits for a transfer.
- If your relationship has broken down with your existing solicitor or several solicitors.
- If you have been released under investigation and have already had a police station attendance.
- If you hold legal aid with another firm and seek a second opinion.
- If you are calling on behalf of the client as a friend or family member unless you have full authority and full facts.
- To businesses.
- Advising whether you were given good advice by your other solicitor.
- Whether to decide to plead guilty or not guilty.
- Whether you have an arguable defence in law or factually complicated defences.
- Any advice you have had after your first court appearance.
- Any advice on appeal on conviction or sentence.
- If we feel we are unable to communicate with you.
- If we are likely to be conflicted or breach our professional rules.