JD Spicer Zeb Solicitors Banner Image

Useful Information

Services
People
News and Events
Other
Blogs

Rap on Trial: Lyrics as Evidence in UK Courts

View profile for Umar Zeb
  • Posted
  • Author

There has been plenty of discussion surrounding rap and drill lyrics and whether they can be utilised as evidence in criminal trials.

Over the past few years, there have been multiple instances of rap and drill lyrics being used to support criminal charges. When approached by the Guardian in 2023, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) stated that it “has never prosecuted anybody solely on the basis of their involvement with drill/rap music” but “drill/rap music may be of specific relevance to the case against a suspect, in which case it may be used as evidence.”

Research conducted with The University of Manchester’s Prosecuting Rap project identified more than 70 criminal trials from 2020-2023 in which rap evidence including lyrics, music videos and audio recordings were used by police and prosecutors to build their cases.

This tells us that rap and drill lyrics often play a pivotal role in criminal trials. But what level of influence can these lyrics have? And can they decide the final outcome in a particular case?

The following article is for informational purposes and should not be taken as legal advice. If you need legal support with any criminal allegations and the prospect of lyrics being used as evidence against you, then please get in touch and our team can advise you.

How are rap and drill lyrics used as evidence in court?

The way rap and drill lyrics could be used as evidence in court can vary depending on a variety of factors and the particulars of a case:

Examples of legal precedents where rap and drill lyrics have been used as evidence in court include:

Digga D (Rhys Herbert)

In 2018, Rhys Herbert, known by his stage name Digga D, was convicted of conspiracy to commit violent disorder. His lyrics and social media posts were used as evidence to demonstrate his involvement in gang activities. The court placed a Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO) on him, restricting his ability to release music without police approval.

Det Ch Supt Kevin Southworth said at the time of the CBO being ordered: “When in this instance you see a particular genre of music being used specifically to goad, to incite, to provoke, to inflame, that can only lead to acts of very serious violence being committed, that’s when it becomes a matter for the police.”

Skengdo & AM (Terrell Doyley and Joshua Malinga)

In 2019, drill rappers Skengdo and AM were given suspended prison sentences for performing their song “Attempted 1.0” at a concert, which the authorities argued incited violence and promoted gang activity. The song and lyrics contained within had been banned previously by the police, and performing it was considered a breach of a gang injunction.

Loski (Jyrelle O’Connor)

In 2021, Jyrelle O’Connor, known as Loski, was convicted of possessing a firearm with intent to endanger life. During his drill lyrics were used by the prosecution to argue that he was involved in gang violence via his association with the Kensington-based criminal gang, the Harlem Spartans. The defence argued that the lyrics were artistic expression and not an admission of criminal conduct.

Unknown T (Daniel Lena)

In 2021, Daniel Lena, known as Unknown T, was acquitted of murder charges. During the trial, prosecutors attempted to use his drill lyrics to suggest a propensity for violence. The defence successfully argued that the lyrics were fictional and part of his musical persona.

Are there any specific laws or guidelines in the UK regarding this practice?

Lyrics are not normally used by prosecutors as direct evidence of a confession or intention to commit a crime.

Rather, drill and rap lyrics can be used by the prosecution as an example of ‘bad character’ evidence. The admissibility of bad character evidence in court proceedings is defined in Section 98 of the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 2003:

“References in this Chapter to evidence of a person’s ‘bad character’ are to evidence of, or of a disposition towards, misconduct on his part, other than evidence which –

  1. Has to do with the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant is charged, or
  2. Is evidence of misconduct in connection with the investigation or prosecution of that offence”

‘Misconduct’ is defined in Section 112 of the CJA as: “the commission of an offence or of other reprehensible behaviour”

Why is drill music particularly targeted in these legal cases?

There are several potential explanations for drill music being specifically targeted in legal cases, particularly with regard to the admissibility of bad character evidence.

Violent and provocative lyrics

Drill music often contains explicit references to violence and crime. Prosecutors could argue that such references could be used to incite real-world violence or directly contribute to gang conflicts. In some cases, lyrics may reference violent acts that have already taken place or mention rival gangs.

Social Media and Online Platforms:

Drill music is frequently shared on social media and video platforms like YouTube. These platforms can amplify the reach of the music and its messages, potentially influencing a broader audience. Law enforcement agencies monitor these platforms to track gang activity and gather intelligence which can then be used as evidence during a trial.

Real-World Impact

There have been instances where drill music videos and lyrics have been directly linked to violent crimes, including stabbings and shootings. Authorities believe that some drill artists use their music to boast about or threaten violence, which can have real-world consequences.

Community Concerns

Local communities and advocacy groups often express concerns about the impact of drill music on young people. They argue that the music can glamorize a dangerous lifestyle and negatively influence impressionable youth, leading to more crime and anti-social behaviour.

Is there a distinction between artistic expression and criminal intent in these cases?

There is understandable concern that the use of drill as evidence in criminal trials diminishes its place as a form of artistic expression.

Drill frequently uses violent language and imagery, but this is true of many different genres of music. An argument suggests that the ‘shock’ value of drill lyrics should not be taken at face value.

Digga D, whose lyrics were used as evidence in a case which resulted in him being subjected to a CBO, put forward the argument that lyrics alone do not necessarily dictate behaviour and other forms of media, such as violent video games, would not typically be cited in legal proceedings to demonstrate bad character.

A campaign was launched by Art not Evidence in 2023, backed by MPs and lawyers, which seeks to stop the use of creative and artistic expression as evidence in criminal trials.

Does the use of rap and drill lyrics in court disproportionately affect minority communities?

There is evidence to suggest that the use of rap and drill lyrics in court does disproportionately affect ethnic minorities. Based on a report compiled by the Centre on the Dynamics of Ethnicity, in cases involving rap music in England and Wales, 84% of defendants were minority ethnic people, with 66% of those Black, compared with 4% of the overall English and Welsh population, with a further 12% Black or mixed.

Are you facing a criminal trial?

We understand that facing a criminal trial can be extremely distressing, especially if it could lead to a prison sentence. It is vital that you have the strongest possible legal defence on your side if you are to achieve a positive outcome for your case.

Our criminal defence solicitors have over 45 years of experience in representing individuals facing a wide range of charges. This experience, coupled with our depth of expertise, ensures that we are in the best possible position to help you have charges dropped, or a sentence lowered if conviction is unavoidable.

We are highly skilled at handling and presenting the various types of evidence that are typically relied on by the prosecution, including the use of rap and drill lyrics as an admission of bad character. We can identify the flaws in the use of such evidence, as well as highlight any contrasting evidence which supports your position.

We have also been accredited by the Law Society for Criminal Litigation. Our experience has meant that we can demonstrate a strong track record of previous success and has helped us to build strong relationships with many of the country’s leading criminal defence barristers.

If you are facing a criminal charge, we are here to provide you with the support you need.

Related matters:

Our related cases

Fees and funding

When you work with our team, we will always be open and transparent about the likely fees that will be related to your case.

If you need to attend court in relation to criminal charges, Legal Aid may become available. Whether you can access Legal Aid will depend on whether the grant of public funding is justified.

Where you do not qualify for Legal Aid, the alternative will be to fund the case on a private basis.          

To find out more about the way we handle fees (both Legal Aid and private fees) please use the links provided below:

Contact our criminal defence lawyers today

If you are due to attend the police station, require any urgent specialist advice, or immediate representation, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

You can contact our dedicated criminal defence lawyers in London, Birmingham, and Manchester by telephone on:

Or email: solicitors@jdspicer.co.uk

Alternatively, you can fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we will get back to you quickly.

24/7 legal representation

Please get in touch for a free consultation with one of our expert criminal defence solicitors, as well as immediate representation and advice.

We are available to represent clients all over England and Wales at any time, so please contact our Emergency Number at 07836 577 556

Bespoke Private Fee Service

If you believe your case is likely to have serious consequences for you now, or in the future and you have the means to pay for this service

Read More

Do we offer free consultations? 

Read More

How can we help?

Common questions

We always work with the most experienced and best leading UK barristers, KCs (Kings Counsel). We cover all criminal cases 24/7 at the police station and court. Offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester cover cases across England and Wales. We can offer Legal Aid and affordable Private fee agreements. We can see you the same day, including virtually. Our Senior Partners supervise all of our cases.

How quickly do you respond?

We respond quickly even during out of hours. We do not get our work by paying for online adverts but based on the fact that few criminal law firms can match our 45 years of experience. Most of our cases are still from word-of-mouth recommendations from satisfied clients. We are called daily by dissatisfied clients from firms with less experience than us. We respond very quickly to new enquiries. We know what clients seek and so we update clients rapidly.

Can you get cases dropped?

Yes, read about the recent cases we've helped our clients with here.

We always keep you updated and give straightforward advice. We will get cases dropped early where the case is weak or should not be prosecuted. We will be upfront with you about where you can benefit from a good result with an early guilty plea, such as a discount on your sentence. As we work on cases across all levels with clients from all walks of life, we are excellent at giving clear, spot-on advice. As an established firm, we can allocate a whole team to your case often at short notice to secure evidence to minimise the damage to you. 

Have you won any awards?

OUR PROFESSIONAL BODY THE LAW SOCIETY AWARDED US IN OCTOBER 2020 WITH THE EXCELLENCE IN CLIENT SERVICE AWARD AND STATED - 

"JD Spicer Zeb demonstrated a clear commitment to client service through their work with vulnerable and diverse individuals in what can be severely traumatic circumstances".

Do you offer free consultations?

Where it is possible, we aim to provide an initial consultation to you. If we can speak to you, we can if required inform you about  –

  • Whether we can take the case on and our relevant experience.
  • Public and private funding benefits.
  • Assistance in applying for legal aid where we are likely to accept instructions.
  • An outline of options in police interview only. We will not advise you on which option to adopt.
  • Providing our free written guide explaining the police station process.
  • The gravity of routine and day-to-day offences you face.
  • Consequences of not attending the court or police station.
  • Consequences of interfering with any witnesses.
  • Retaining any evidence in support of your case.
  • If possible an outline of the elements of the offence that the police or CPS must prove.
  • This consultation will normally be by telephone or email and will only be for as long as we deem necessary to establish if we can act for you. If we cannot usefully give you any advice in this manner then we will not continue with the consultation. We will not discuss the case in depth for you to be able to decide on your plea or any significant aspect of the case, as this cannot be undertaken informally.
  • Referring you, if possible, to other firms for matters out of our specialism or if we cannot help.

Consultations do not apply to the following cases –

  • If we do not intend to take the case on.
  • Road Traffic cases, drink driving, drug driving, driving bans, speeding, no insurance, mobile phone use, points etc.
  • In all cases where we do not have the capacity to take your case or the availability of suitably qualified staff to provide an initial free consultation. This is applicable in all cases but especially where a more senior lawyer is required because of your personal needs or the complexity of the case.
  • Harassment/stalking/ coercive behaviour/malicious communications or road traffic cases and most sensitive cases. These cases are often too complicated to assess in short consultations.
  • The locations concerned may be too distant to represent you adequately or it may not be cost-effective for you or us.
  • The case is too complicated to assess or raises various charges or facts, complexity, or history to be considered informally or in a short consultation.
  • In most Legal aid transfers where legal aid is granted to another firm except in very grave cases, we may assess the case and merits for a transfer.
  • If your relationship has broken down with your existing solicitor or several solicitors.
  • If you have been released under investigation and have already had a police station attendance. 
  • If you hold legal aid with another firm and seek a second opinion.
  • If you are calling on behalf of the client as a friend or family member unless you have full authority and full facts.
  • To businesses.
  • Advising whether you were given good advice by your other solicitor.
  • Whether to decide to plead guilty or not guilty.
  • Whether you have an arguable defence in law or factually complicated defences.
  • Any advice you have had after your first court appearance.
  • Any advice on appeal on conviction or sentence.
  • If we feel we are unable to communicate with you.
  • If we are likely to be conflicted or breach our professional rules.