Breach of Trust Theft Dropped After Abuse of Process Argument 2024
We work to get our clients' cases dropped before court hearings by making written representations to the CPS/Police.
Our client, a medical professional, was arrested for theft after allegedly taking an item from a service user’s home whilst conducting an appointment. This act was captured on a surveillance camera fitted inside the service user’s home. Our client declined access to a solicitor at the Police Station but, whilst on bail, realised it was in his best interests to seek legal advice, so contacted J D Spicer Zeb to represent him moving forward on an enhanced private basis. We took the client’s statement and subsequently attended the Police Station and reviewed the CCTV footage. At this point our client strenuously denied the allegation. However, based on what the CCTV footage captured, our client was charged. Due to our advice as to the strength of the prosecution evidence, our client then admitted the offence and we were instructed to serve written representations on the CPS in an attempt to get our client’s case disposed of by way of a caution.
Upon review of our written representations, prior to our client’s first appearance at Court, the CPS informed us that they had reconsidered the case and concluded that our client was in fact suitable for an out-of-court disposal and that, thereby, a prosecution would not be pursued. The Officer in the Case also agreed to the issuing of a caution. However, the day before our client’s first appearance at Court and without informing our client, the CPS retracted their assurance of a caution and decided to proceed with prosecution. The CPS communicated to the Court that the offer of a caution was given in error, and, fortunately for our client, we kept a close eye on the online case system which allowed us to see such correspondence before the hearing. We, therefore, were able to strategise the evening before, and subsequently attend the hearing where we gave notice of our intention to make an application to the Court to stay proceedings due to an Abuse of Process. An abuse of process hearing was listed, and the matter was adjourned.
Our client was not in a position to fund any further work. Still, we felt that allowing the CPS to renege on their promise of a caution fundamentally offended the principle of justice to such an extent that we were unwilling to stop the case at this point. As such, we agreed to continue representing our client pro bono to ensure that he received the outcome that justice required.
Our application was based on the principle established in R v Maxwell, where it was confirmed that the Court has the power to stay proceedings in situations where it offends the Court’s sense of justice and propriety to be asked to try the accused in the particular circumstances of the case. In particular, we relied on the Court of Appeal case of R v Hamza, which ruled that it may be an abuse of process to proceed with a prosecution where (i) there has been an unequivocal representation by those with the conduct of the investigation or prosecution of a case that the Defendant will not be prosecuted; and (ii) the Defendant has acted on that representation to his detriment. We sought to show how the CPS had contravened both the Code for Crown Prosecutors and the Criminal Procedure Rules, and emphasised the public interest in upholding assurances provided by government officials.
One of our experienced prospective barrister Paralegals, Maeve Carroll, supervised by Senior Partner Umar Zeb, prepared a skeleton argument, which we served in advance of the court's deadline. However, in contravention of the court's directions, the CPS failed to respond to the skeleton argument despite our numerous attempts to obtain a response.
At the abuse of process hearing, the CPS stated that they had reviewed the case and had decided to offer our client an out-of-court disposal rather than contest our application. As such, no oral abuse of process argument was made, and the matter was instead adjourned for the Police to as administer our client with a caution.
However, before the Police issued our client with a caution, the CPS proceeded to drop all charges against our client by serving a notice of discontinuance. As a result, our client has neither been prosecuted nor cautioned for the offence in question. After months of our client being anxious over his future and losing faith in the justice system, we are incredibly pleased that we could secure such a favourable outcome.
Contact our experts for further advice
How can we help?
Common questions
We always work with the most experienced and best leading UK barristers, KCs (Kings Counsel). We cover all criminal cases 24/7 at the police station and court. Offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester cover cases across England and Wales. We can offer Legal Aid and affordable Private fee agreements. We can see you the same day, including virtually. Our Senior Partners supervise all of our cases.
How quickly do you respond?
We respond quickly even during out of hours. We do not get our work by paying for online adverts but based on the fact that few criminal law firms can match our 45 years of experience. Most of our cases are still from word-of-mouth recommendations from satisfied clients. We are called daily by dissatisfied clients from firms with less experience than us. We respond very quickly to new enquiries. We know what clients seek and so we update clients rapidly.
Can you get cases dropped?
Yes, read about the recent cases we've helped our clients with here.
We always keep you updated and give straightforward advice. We will get cases dropped early where the case is weak or should not be prosecuted. We will be upfront with you about where you can benefit from a good result with an early guilty plea, such as a discount on your sentence. As we work on cases across all levels with clients from all walks of life, we are excellent at giving clear, spot-on advice. As an established firm, we can allocate a whole team to your case often at short notice to secure evidence to minimise the damage to you.
Have you won any awards?
OUR PROFESSIONAL BODY THE LAW SOCIETY AWARDED US IN OCTOBER 2020 WITH THE EXCELLENCE IN CLIENT SERVICE AWARD AND STATED -
"JD Spicer Zeb demonstrated a clear commitment to client service through their work with vulnerable and diverse individuals in what can be severely traumatic circumstances".
Do you offer free consultations?
Where it is possible, we aim to provide an initial consultation to you. If we can speak to you, we can if required inform you about –
- Whether we can take the case on and our relevant experience.
- Public and private funding benefits.
- Assistance in applying for legal aid where we are likely to accept instructions.
- An outline of options in police interview only. We will not advise you on which option to adopt.
- Providing our free written guide explaining the police station process.
- The gravity of routine and day-to-day offences you face.
- Consequences of not attending the court or police station.
- Consequences of interfering with any witnesses.
- Retaining any evidence in support of your case.
- If possible an outline of the elements of the offence that the police or CPS must prove.
- This consultation will normally be by telephone or email and will only be for as long as we deem necessary to establish if we can act for you. If we cannot usefully give you any advice in this manner then we will not continue with the consultation. We will not discuss the case in depth for you to be able to decide on your plea or any significant aspect of the case, as this cannot be undertaken informally.
- Referring you, if possible, to other firms for matters out of our specialism or if we cannot help.
Consultations do not apply to the following cases –
- If we do not intend to take the case on.
- Road Traffic cases, drink driving, drug driving, driving bans, speeding, no insurance, mobile phone use, points etc.
- In all cases where we do not have the capacity to take your case or the availability of suitably qualified staff to provide an initial free consultation. This is applicable in all cases but especially where a more senior lawyer is required because of your personal needs or the complexity of the case.
- Harassment/stalking/ coercive behaviour/malicious communications or road traffic cases and most sensitive cases. These cases are often too complicated to assess in short consultations.
- The locations concerned may be too distant to represent you adequately or it may not be cost-effective for you or us.
- The case is too complicated to assess or raises various charges or facts, complexity, or history to be considered informally or in a short consultation.
- In most Legal aid transfers where legal aid is granted to another firm except in very grave cases, we may assess the case and merits for a transfer.
- If your relationship has broken down with your existing solicitor or several solicitors.
- If you have been released under investigation and have already had a police station attendance.
- If you hold legal aid with another firm and seek a second opinion.
- If you are calling on behalf of the client as a friend or family member unless you have full authority and full facts.
- To businesses.
- Advising whether you were given good advice by your other solicitor.
- Whether to decide to plead guilty or not guilty.
- Whether you have an arguable defence in law or factually complicated defences.
- Any advice you have had after your first court appearance.
- Any advice on appeal on conviction or sentence.
- If we feel we are unable to communicate with you.
- If we are likely to be conflicted or breach our professional rules.