JD Spicer Zeb Solicitors Banner Image

Useful Information

Services
People
News and Events
Other
Blogs

Two brothers held in armed raid on home released without charge

  • Police unable to find link to biological terror plot 
  • Family use mosques to neutralise extreme protest

The two brothers arrested last week in an anti-terror raid on a house in east London, in which one was shot, were released without charge last night after police failed to find any link to an alleged biological terror plot. 

CLICK HERE FOR BBC COVERAGE 

However, the Metropolitan police said the intelligence which led to the raid last Friday was still being developed, adding that all lines of inquiry would be exhausted.

Mohammed Abdul Kahar, 23 and Abul Koyair, 20, maintained their innocence throughout their detention. They were released from Paddington Green high security police station shortly before 8:30pm after an extensive search of their house.

More than 250 police officers, some of them armed and wearing biochemical suits, burst into the house at 4am last Friday after receiving intelligence claiming that a chemical or biological weapon could be inside. During the operation, Mr Kahar was shot in the shoulder by a police gun. Police maintained that they had been left with "no choice" but to force entry into the home, because there was "very specific" intelligence of a threat to public safety.

Security sources said the timing of the raid was dictated by fears that an attack on a British target using an unconventional weapon could be soon be staged.

But as the week drew on, senior officers came under increasing pressure and were forced to concede that there may never have been such a weapon in the house.

The shooting of Mr Kahar will be investigated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which could take months to produce a report.

At the same time, the Met regards the investigation into the intelligence as an ongoing inquiry which may lead elsewhere, with the possibility of more raids.

The home secretary, John Reid, last night defended the police.

"The police are acting in the best interests of the whole community in order to protect the whole community, and they therefore deserve the support of the whole community in doing what is often a very hazardous and dangerous job often involving difficult decisions," he said.

Scotland Yard said the two men would be contacted so arrangements could be made for property to be handed back to them. It also said the police would undertake appropriate restoration work.

The Met's assistant commissioner, Andy Hayman, thanked the community for its understanding. "We have worked with the local community since the operation on Friday to keep them updated and have listened to their concerns." he said.

The two brothers were arrested under the Terrorism Act, and held on suspicion of the commission, preparation and instigation of acts of terrorism. Mr Kahar was held under armed guard at Royal London hospital in Whitechapel, as he recovered from his wounds. He was shot in the upper right hand side of his chest, with the bullet exiting through his shoulder.Azad Ali chair of the Muslim Safety Forum, which tries to improve relations between the Muslim community and the police, said officers should explain fully to the family what happened and apologise for the trauma they caused.

"The police have clearly made errors and they have to learn lessons," he said.

Earlier yesterday, the men's family foiled an attempt by extremists to hijack their protest against the police actions.

Around 35 men and 15 women attended a noisy demonstration opposite Forest Gate police station in east London organised by Anjem Choudary, formerly a close associate of the exiled cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed. Mr Choudary had said hundreds of angry Muslims would attend the protest once they had left their mosques after Friday prayers. But the brothers' family sent a statement to at least 20 mosques on Thursday evening which was read to worshippers during prayers yesterday afternoon, urging them to disassociate themselves from the event.

Mr Koyair and Mr Kahar's sister, Humeya Kalam, said the police raid represented "barbaric and horrific actions" but an extremist protest would "only give another opportunity for our community to be portrayed in a negative light".

Family thwart extremists' bid to hijack terror raid protest

The family of the terrorism suspect who was shot by police last week foiled an attempt by extremists to hijack their protest campaign yesterday.

Around 35 men and 15 women attended a noisy demonstration opposite Forest Gate police station organised by Anjem Choudary, formerly a close associate of the exiled cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed. Mr Choudary had said hundreds of angry Muslims would attend the protest once they had left their mosques after Friday prayers.

But the suspect's family sent a statement to at least 20 mosques on Thursday evening which was read to worshippers during prayers yesterday afternoon, urging them to disassociate themselves from the event.

Humeya Kalam, the suspect's sister, said the police raid represented "barbaric and horrific actions taken against an innocent family". But she said an extremist protest would "only give another opportunity for our community to be portrayed in a negative light".

"This will allow the police to inflict the same trauma that we have been through on another family," she said. "More brothers and sisters as a result could be arrested, which will have an adverse effect in proving both of my brothers' innocence." She urged those who wanted to protest to attend a "peaceful community demonstration" scheduled for next week.

The message was backed up by a cousin, Enam, who went to the edge of the demonstration to urge people to stay away.

Mohammed Abdul Kahar, 23, was shot in Forest Gate during the raid on his family home by police searching for a chemical bomb. His brother Abul Koyair, 20, was also detained. Both were arrested on charges connected with terrorism offences and are being held at Paddington Green high security police station.

During the demonstration, which saw protesters heavily outnumbered by police officers, Mr Choudary and other speakers castigated the police and the government for the shooting, and for the broader foreign policy in Iraq and other "Muslim lands". Mr Choudary led chants of "Muslims are innocent, Tony Blair is a terrorist", and accused prominent Muslim groups and individuals of failing the community, labelling them "sycophants".

Last week's raid, and the subsequent failure to locate any chemical device at the house, have put police and community relations under strain. On Thursday, Scotland Yard assistant commissioner Andy Hayman apologised for the disruption the operation caused; but he has also said the police had no choice but to carry it out.

Yesterday Sir Robin Wales, Newham's mayor, said he would seek the full facts from John Reid, the home secretary. But he also condemned outside agitators "stirring up division and fomenting unrest". 

Contact our experts for further advice

Bespoke Private Fee Service

If you believe your case is likely to have serious consequences for you now, or in the future and you have the means to pay for this service

Read More

Do we offer free consultations? 

Read More

How can we help?

Common questions

We always work with the most experienced and best leading UK barristers, KCs (Kings Counsel). We cover all criminal cases 24/7 at the police station and court. Offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester cover cases across England and Wales. We can offer Legal Aid and affordable Private fee agreements. We can see you the same day, including virtually. Our Senior Partners supervise all of our cases.

How quickly do you respond?

We respond quickly even during out of hours. We do not get our work by paying for online adverts but based on the fact that few criminal law firms can match our 45 years of experience. Most of our cases are still from word-of-mouth recommendations from satisfied clients. We are called daily by dissatisfied clients from firms with less experience than us. We respond very quickly to new enquiries. We know what clients seek and so we update clients rapidly.

Can you get cases dropped?

Yes, read about the recent cases we've helped our clients with here.

We always keep you updated and give straightforward advice. We will get cases dropped early where the case is weak or should not be prosecuted. We will be upfront with you about where you can benefit from a good result with an early guilty plea, such as a discount on your sentence. As we work on cases across all levels with clients from all walks of life, we are excellent at giving clear, spot-on advice. As an established firm, we can allocate a whole team to your case often at short notice to secure evidence to minimise the damage to you. 

Have you won any awards?

OUR PROFESSIONAL BODY THE LAW SOCIETY AWARDED US IN OCTOBER 2020 WITH THE EXCELLENCE IN CLIENT SERVICE AWARD AND STATED - 

"JD Spicer Zeb demonstrated a clear commitment to client service through their work with vulnerable and diverse individuals in what can be severely traumatic circumstances".

Do you offer free consultations?

Where it is possible, we aim to provide an initial consultation to you. If we can speak to you, we can if required inform you about  –

  • Whether we can take the case on and our relevant experience.
  • Public and private funding benefits.
  • Assistance in applying for legal aid where we are likely to accept instructions.
  • An outline of options in police interview only. We will not advise you on which option to adopt.
  • Providing our free written guide explaining the police station process.
  • The gravity of routine and day-to-day offences you face.
  • Consequences of not attending the court or police station.
  • Consequences of interfering with any witnesses.
  • Retaining any evidence in support of your case.
  • If possible an outline of the elements of the offence that the police or CPS must prove.
  • This consultation will normally be by telephone or email and will only be for as long as we deem necessary to establish if we can act for you. If we cannot usefully give you any advice in this manner then we will not continue with the consultation. We will not discuss the case in depth for you to be able to decide on your plea or any significant aspect of the case, as this cannot be undertaken informally.
  • Referring you, if possible, to other firms for matters out of our specialism or if we cannot help.

Consultations do not apply to the following cases –

  • If we do not intend to take the case on.
  • Road Traffic cases, drink driving, drug driving, driving bans, speeding, no insurance, mobile phone use, points etc.
  • In all cases where we do not have the capacity to take your case or the availability of suitably qualified staff to provide an initial free consultation. This is applicable in all cases but especially where a more senior lawyer is required because of your personal needs or the complexity of the case.
  • Harassment/stalking/ coercive behaviour/malicious communications or road traffic cases and most sensitive cases. These cases are often too complicated to assess in short consultations.
  • The locations concerned may be too distant to represent you adequately or it may not be cost-effective for you or us.
  • The case is too complicated to assess or raises various charges or facts, complexity, or history to be considered informally or in a short consultation.
  • In most Legal aid transfers where legal aid is granted to another firm except in very grave cases, we may assess the case and merits for a transfer.
  • If your relationship has broken down with your existing solicitor or several solicitors.
  • If you have been released under investigation and have already had a police station attendance. 
  • If you hold legal aid with another firm and seek a second opinion.
  • If you are calling on behalf of the client as a friend or family member unless you have full authority and full facts.
  • To businesses.
  • Advising whether you were given good advice by your other solicitor.
  • Whether to decide to plead guilty or not guilty.
  • Whether you have an arguable defence in law or factually complicated defences.
  • Any advice you have had after your first court appearance.
  • Any advice on appeal on conviction or sentence.
  • If we feel we are unable to communicate with you.
  • If we are likely to be conflicted or breach our professional rules.